http://ca.sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nhl-pu ... 24316.html
Put me in the minority that thinks that this was the best ending for this game.
Apparently there wasn't much to choose from in terms of these two teams, and I do share their safety concerns after 10 periods of hockey.
Any other thoughts.
Seven OT's and still no winner . . .
Moderators: stuffedwolf, TopShelf, Magellan, noofadmin
2 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Seven OT's and still no winner . . .
by Eagle Vision » Mon Mar 10, 2014 8:51 am
Arsonists make pathetic hockey fans
http://www.RangersRush.com/
http://www.jrahockey.com/
"being stupid. That's the way I coach." - Rick Tocchet
http://www.RangersRush.com/
http://www.jrahockey.com/
"being stupid. That's the way I coach." - Rick Tocchet
-
Eagle Vision - NOOFer
- Posts: 4705
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 8:10 pm
- Location: Kitchener
Re: Seven OT's and still no winner . . .
by Danger Girl » Mon Mar 10, 2014 7:03 pm
As much as it pains me to say this, I agree, EV. I'm surprised that we are in the minority. In fact I suspect once you get away from people with an emotional stake in the outcome, most people would agree with this decision.
Donna
24 OHL arenas and counting...
If the instigator rule is killing hockey now, having to fight every time you throw a clean hit would kill hockey even faster.
24 OHL arenas and counting...
If the instigator rule is killing hockey now, having to fight every time you throw a clean hit would kill hockey even faster.
-
Danger Girl - NOOFer
- Posts: 7144
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 5:57 pm
- Location: Detroit
2 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests